Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
3300fps to fast for Barnes TTSX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jakeSCH" data-source="post: 2361475" data-attributes="member: 119202"><p>Not trying to be argumentative either, but one lung is not "lungs". When i read your post, I assumed that it was a single lung shot. The pressure in the chest cavity did not drop meaning the second lung did not collapse. My point was even if the bullet had a 50% increase in diameter and did not shear the petals...would the result have been much different? Is really an 1/8" larger diameter the difference? It is very well possibly, but to me the real difference is understanding the mechanics of how a mono metal bullet kills verses a lead bullet.</p><p></p><p>You had 2 to 3 feet of penetration from the flank to the shoulder, that is exactly what the bullet is designed to do.</p><p></p><p>I do agree, that most likely with your traditional lead bullets and the same shot taken...deer would have not made it to the fence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jakeSCH, post: 2361475, member: 119202"] Not trying to be argumentative either, but one lung is not "lungs". When i read your post, I assumed that it was a single lung shot. The pressure in the chest cavity did not drop meaning the second lung did not collapse. My point was even if the bullet had a 50% increase in diameter and did not shear the petals...would the result have been much different? Is really an 1/8" larger diameter the difference? It is very well possibly, but to me the real difference is understanding the mechanics of how a mono metal bullet kills verses a lead bullet. You had 2 to 3 feet of penetration from the flank to the shoulder, that is exactly what the bullet is designed to do. I do agree, that most likely with your traditional lead bullets and the same shot taken...deer would have not made it to the fence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
3300fps to fast for Barnes TTSX
Top