Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300WM and 190+SMK Load
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="abinok" data-source="post: 70875" data-attributes="member: 16"><p>yep, that 175SMK is quite a bullet.</p><p>The folks at the drawing board had their hats on straight the day they designed it for sure.</p><p>The 175SMK is one of the few bullets ive had the chance to test for BC across the Chronys... we measured them at .529 (corrected for standard). 190s went .561. Sierra's published figures are lower for both bullets, and the 220SMK as well for that matter, but in my testing, they gave up very little to the Bergers of the same weight (175s).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="abinok, post: 70875, member: 16"] yep, that 175SMK is quite a bullet. The folks at the drawing board had their hats on straight the day they designed it for sure. The 175SMK is one of the few bullets ive had the chance to test for BC across the Chronys... we measured them at .529 (corrected for standard). 190s went .561. Sierra's published figures are lower for both bullets, and the 220SMK as well for that matter, but in my testing, they gave up very little to the Bergers of the same weight (175s). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300WM and 190+SMK Load
Top