Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 395804" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>BH,</p><p>There's really nothing here to respond to.</p><p></p><p>All I know about this event is what a journalist reported. Believe it or not, the majority of people do believe the press. </p><p></p><p>You've aired your belief that Forum members who question this journalist's report derive pleasure from denigrating a military sniper. I don't see any basis for it. This backpeddling you've repeatedly made reference to - I don't see it. Nothing has been stated that required backpeddling. You've come closer in your statements than any of the other members have in this Thread to typing statements requiring backpeddling, and you're clearly proud of it. </p><p></p><p>In my line of work, there is little more dangerous than a person that doesn't know what they don't know, and then they proceed to implement. Your presumption to <strong>know</strong> the mind of another man or woman - that puts you in that category. Doesn't matter how many battles you've fought. Your presumption to know the minds and motives of other members posting on this forum, and then acting on it, places you over the edge. Judge and jury.</p><p></p><p>There's no basis for your conclusions. It's simply your opinion, unsupported by reference to any statements made in any post. You've made what you chose to make out of this Thread, and finally decided to jump in and speak your peace of mind. Good for you. I don't doubt that you feel you've "earned it". Doesn't make it right. All it means is you don't like my posts or the posts of others. We must be anti-<strong>something</strong>, anti-establishment, anti-military, anti-sniper, anti-conservative, anything to stir up the wrath of the masses and get the ball rolling. Simply because we don't see it your way. You really haven't articulated what that awful "<strong>something</strong>" is with any clarity. Because if you did, then your contentions would be exposed as the by-product of an axe-to-grind miss-guided imagination. And you'd be the one doing the CYA backpeddling. Your other option - delete your post after-the-fact, as you've practiced in the past.</p><p></p><p>I'll classify this as the shooting star scenario. The better of the two possibilities. Unable to sustain the flame. Take your own valued advice and let the dog (your judge & jury deductions) lie.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 395804, member: 4191"] BH, There's really nothing here to respond to. All I know about this event is what a journalist reported. Believe it or not, the majority of people do believe the press. You've aired your belief that Forum members who question this journalist's report derive pleasure from denigrating a military sniper. I don't see any basis for it. This backpeddling you've repeatedly made reference to - I don't see it. Nothing has been stated that required backpeddling. You've come closer in your statements than any of the other members have in this Thread to typing statements requiring backpeddling, and you're clearly proud of it. In my line of work, there is little more dangerous than a person that doesn't know what they don't know, and then they proceed to implement. Your presumption to [B]know[/B] the mind of another man or woman - that puts you in that category. Doesn't matter how many battles you've fought. Your presumption to know the minds and motives of other members posting on this forum, and then acting on it, places you over the edge. Judge and jury. There's no basis for your conclusions. It's simply your opinion, unsupported by reference to any statements made in any post. You've made what you chose to make out of this Thread, and finally decided to jump in and speak your peace of mind. Good for you. I don't doubt that you feel you've "earned it". Doesn't make it right. All it means is you don't like my posts or the posts of others. We must be anti-[B]something[/B], anti-establishment, anti-military, anti-sniper, anti-conservative, anything to stir up the wrath of the masses and get the ball rolling. Simply because we don't see it your way. You really haven't articulated what that awful "[B]something[/B]" is with any clarity. Because if you did, then your contentions would be exposed as the by-product of an axe-to-grind miss-guided imagination. And you'd be the one doing the CYA backpeddling. Your other option - delete your post after-the-fact, as you've practiced in the past. I'll classify this as the shooting star scenario. The better of the two possibilities. Unable to sustain the flame. Take your own valued advice and let the dog (your judge & jury deductions) lie. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
Top