Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmden" data-source="post: 395690" data-attributes="member: 1742"><p>big,</p><p> </p><p>Not that it's going to change your mind or anybody's mind, but, at least in this current thread, I don't see anyone specifically beating the armed forces. </p><p> </p><p>This is simply a discussion of ballistics--nothing more and nothing less. </p><p> </p><p>The reported (having been reported on quite a bit, I always take the accuracy of any press report with a very large grain of salt) situation simply raised some red flags and will continue to do so. </p><p> </p><p>There is nothing you can do to stop it. It is not wrong...it is not right...it simply is. </p><p> </p><p>I take offense at those who might denigrate my patriotism because I'm here discussing the relative merits of the ballistics of a situation that has been made public. I also take offense at those who denigrate the military or sniper said to have taken this shot and use this press report to do so. IMHO, it is very likely that there is quite a bit more to the story than has been reported and we should be careful to judge the 'reported' actions of those reportedly involved.</p><p> </p><p>However, judging the ballistic merits of what has been reported is a straightforward matter, the discussion of which should ensue in a manner respectful and mindful of what our military does for us, keeping in mind that we may only know a part of the story.</p><p> </p><p>Just my .02,</p><p> </p><p>Jon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmden, post: 395690, member: 1742"] big, Not that it's going to change your mind or anybody's mind, but, at least in this current thread, I don't see anyone specifically beating the armed forces. This is simply a discussion of ballistics--nothing more and nothing less. The reported (having been reported on quite a bit, I always take the accuracy of any press report with a very large grain of salt) situation simply raised some red flags and will continue to do so. There is nothing you can do to stop it. It is not wrong...it is not right...it simply is. I take offense at those who might denigrate my patriotism because I'm here discussing the relative merits of the ballistics of a situation that has been made public. I also take offense at those who denigrate the military or sniper said to have taken this shot and use this press report to do so. IMHO, it is very likely that there is quite a bit more to the story than has been reported and we should be careful to judge the 'reported' actions of those reportedly involved. However, judging the ballistic merits of what has been reported is a straightforward matter, the discussion of which should ensue in a manner respectful and mindful of what our military does for us, keeping in mind that we may only know a part of the story. Just my .02, Jon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300gn Scenar at 2700 yards
Top