Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
.300 Winchester Magum Bullet Choice - Expanded
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jon A" data-source="post: 95107" data-attributes="member: 319"><p>I haven't tested the 180 BT but I have the 200 AB. It came out a little lower than advertised but was fairly close--probably within the test's margin of error.</p><p></p><p>So I wouldn't expect a 180 BT to be anywhere near that low. How did you arrive at that number? I'd expect them to be right around the .5 mark in a good test, properly corrected for conditions, etc. That said, they don't have as efficient a shape as either the Hornady or Swift--both those will beat it (despite Hornady's more conservative rating).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jon A, post: 95107, member: 319"] I haven't tested the 180 BT but I have the 200 AB. It came out a little lower than advertised but was fairly close--probably within the test's margin of error. So I wouldn't expect a 180 BT to be anywhere near that low. How did you arrive at that number? I'd expect them to be right around the .5 mark in a good test, properly corrected for conditions, etc. That said, they don't have as efficient a shape as either the Hornady or Swift--both those will beat it (despite Hornady's more conservative rating). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
.300 Winchester Magum Bullet Choice - Expanded
Top