Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 Win. Strange reloading Data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="streetglideok" data-source="post: 509293" data-attributes="member: 24889"><p>I have #11 here, and for the 190gr match BT, it says for IMR4350 66gr min, and 70gr max, for IMR4831, 70gr min, and 74gr max. For IMR7828, 75gr min, and 79gr max. That is data from their book, for their particular bullet at the time. What some have seen, is a trend towards lighter loads for some of the older magnums. Ive seen differences between Noslers data, and Hodgdons data even. I usually start at the lower of the two, if they are using the same primers, and follow the normal common sense measures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="streetglideok, post: 509293, member: 24889"] I have #11 here, and for the 190gr match BT, it says for IMR4350 66gr min, and 70gr max, for IMR4831, 70gr min, and 74gr max. For IMR7828, 75gr min, and 79gr max. That is data from their book, for their particular bullet at the time. What some have seen, is a trend towards lighter loads for some of the older magnums. Ive seen differences between Noslers data, and Hodgdons data even. I usually start at the lower of the two, if they are using the same primers, and follow the normal common sense measures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 Win. Strange reloading Data
Top