Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300 wby vs 300 win mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hugnot" data-source="post: 2339322" data-attributes="member: 115658"><p>I am one who puts a premium on practicality, .300 WBY brass is excessively pricy & difficult to find. Velocities would probably be in the order of 2-3 % more with the .300 WBY, than my 3.6" COAL .300WM - no big deal, not worth it. I shoot about 3500-4000 rounds per year from an assortment of 20 rifles, including my .300WM. Periodically, I get good deals on .300 WM, 1X fired brass but prefer the Peterson "long" .300 WM for on the shoulder head space.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hugnot, post: 2339322, member: 115658"] I am one who puts a premium on practicality, .300 WBY brass is excessively pricy & difficult to find. Velocities would probably be in the order of 2-3 % more with the .300 WBY, than my 3.6" COAL .300WM - no big deal, not worth it. I shoot about 3500-4000 rounds per year from an assortment of 20 rifles, including my .300WM. Periodically, I get good deals on .300 WM, 1X fired brass but prefer the Peterson "long" .300 WM for on the shoulder head space. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
300 wby vs 300 win mag
Top