Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Tomahawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darryl Cassel" data-source="post: 29502" data-attributes="member: 34"><p>Everything being equal as per barrel length, yes the 30/378 will win that one but, not by very much. There are a few grains more capacity in the 378 case. </p><p></p><p>The added cost of the bigger action and brass may be a consideration to you and the added velocity (not even 100 FPS) may not be worth it.</p><p></p><p>I have run the 240 gr at 3225 FPS in my 34" Tomahawk. It seems to like the 210 Berger at 3350 FPS also. </p><p></p><p>Later</p><p>DC <img src="http://images/icons/smile.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darryl Cassel, post: 29502, member: 34"] Everything being equal as per barrel length, yes the 30/378 will win that one but, not by very much. There are a few grains more capacity in the 378 case. The added cost of the bigger action and brass may be a consideration to you and the added velocity (not even 100 FPS) may not be worth it. I have run the 240 gr at 3225 FPS in my 34" Tomahawk. It seems to like the 210 Berger at 3350 FPS also. Later DC [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Tomahawk
Top