Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Sherman Shortmag (SS)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 1208117" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>As I recall, the 300 WSSM couldn't keep up with a 300 Win Mag with the heavier bullets. Does equally well with the lighter weight bullets. I also seem to recall that Winchester couldn't get the performance they wanted out of a 338 WSSM, so they never brought that caliber WSSM to market. No benefit over the .338 Win Mag. </p><p></p><p>So it seemed as though the out-performance of the short mags diminished as the caliber/bore increased. Will be awaiting additional reports from your load and MV testing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 1208117, member: 4191"] As I recall, the 300 WSSM couldn't keep up with a 300 Win Mag with the heavier bullets. Does equally well with the lighter weight bullets. I also seem to recall that Winchester couldn't get the performance they wanted out of a 338 WSSM, so they never brought that caliber WSSM to market. No benefit over the .338 Win Mag. So it seemed as though the out-performance of the short mags diminished as the caliber/bore increased. Will be awaiting additional reports from your load and MV testing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Sherman Shortmag (SS)
Top