Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM Load development Qs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RockyMtnMT" data-source="post: 1195043" data-attributes="member: 7999"><p>Generally yes the better group should be better farther out. What I have found is a load at 100 that does not look good may not be bad after all. The group in inches does not get better farther out but the moa size of the group can get better. So a 1.5" at 100 could be 1.5 still at 300. Now all of a sudden it is a half moa load instead of a 1.5 moa load. As a hunter I always look for moa of deer out of my stuff.</p><p></p><p>Have fun.</p><p></p><p>Steve</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RockyMtnMT, post: 1195043, member: 7999"] Generally yes the better group should be better farther out. What I have found is a load at 100 that does not look good may not be bad after all. The group in inches does not get better farther out but the moa size of the group can get better. So a 1.5" at 100 could be 1.5 still at 300. Now all of a sudden it is a half moa load instead of a 1.5 moa load. As a hunter I always look for moa of deer out of my stuff. Have fun. Steve [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
300 RUM Load development Qs
Top