Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Dakota vs 300 WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Muddyboots" data-source="post: 2450823" data-attributes="member: 63925"><p>The 300 Dakota was ahead of the game and was hamstrung by lack of load data, rifle chambering, brass etc. Great cartridge!</p><p></p><p>A 300WSM is another great cartridge but it is what it is. It has nice niche but is always compared to bigger cartridges as if it can magically gain performance to equal or exceed the larger capacity cartridges. More fuel will always = more performance. </p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://press.hornady.com/assets/site/hornady/files/obsolete-data/300-dakota.pdf[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Muddyboots, post: 2450823, member: 63925"] The 300 Dakota was ahead of the game and was hamstrung by lack of load data, rifle chambering, brass etc. Great cartridge! A 300WSM is another great cartridge but it is what it is. It has nice niche but is always compared to bigger cartridges as if it can magically gain performance to equal or exceed the larger capacity cartridges. More fuel will always = more performance. [URL unfurl="true"]https://press.hornady.com/assets/site/hornady/files/obsolete-data/300-dakota.pdf[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Dakota vs 300 WSM
Top