Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Dakota vs 300 WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wild Monkey" data-source="post: 2249481" data-attributes="member: 103097"><p>Thanks for the reply mag. Allowing 80 grains capacity for the WSM and 85 for the Dakota. Can the superior efficiency of the WSM case match the Dakota and overcome the 5 grain deficit? Seeking factual data. (30 Nosler=90 grains) I've never heard of a "WSM" action before. Let's go with "Standard Length" as this scenario does not limit the WSM to a short action shooting 200'ish grain pills.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wild Monkey, post: 2249481, member: 103097"] Thanks for the reply mag. Allowing 80 grains capacity for the WSM and 85 for the Dakota. Can the superior efficiency of the WSM case match the Dakota and overcome the 5 grain deficit? Seeking factual data. (30 Nosler=90 grains) I've never heard of a "WSM" action before. Let's go with "Standard Length" as this scenario does not limit the WSM to a short action shooting 200'ish grain pills. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 Dakota vs 300 WSM
Top