Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
30 Cal 260's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jon A" data-source="post: 474387" data-attributes="member: 319"><p>OK, that didn't make sense, I think I was looking at the pic backward. The old profile is in outline and the new profile is solid, increasing the nose .108? That makes more sense. I do think it'll be a bit much for my magazine but would be usable for others. And that would require a new die, right?</p><p></p><p>I think the easier short term change would be reducing the base diameter of the tip to match the angle of the current ogive more closely. That wouldn't give quite as high a BC but he may be able to do it right now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jon A, post: 474387, member: 319"] OK, that didn't make sense, I think I was looking at the pic backward. The old profile is in outline and the new profile is solid, increasing the nose .108? That makes more sense. I do think it'll be a bit much for my magazine but would be usable for others. And that would require a new die, right? I think the easier short term change would be reducing the base diameter of the tip to match the angle of the current ogive more closely. That wouldn't give quite as high a BC but he may be able to do it right now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
30 Cal 260's
Top