Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
2nd Ammendment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="justgoto" data-source="post: 535050" data-attributes="member: 17125"><p>Hypocritical. Why do you then have that "right?"</p><p></p><p>That is you deciding who can own specific firearms, other than what the Bill of Rights prescribes.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So shoplifters shouldn't have the right to self defense? How about jay-walkers?</p><p></p><p>The Law is specific.</p><p>Every class of 'people' is included; to not include all "people" would be an "infringement."</p><p></p><p>Insuring "the security of a free State," is impossible if the State decides who is armed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="justgoto, post: 535050, member: 17125"] Hypocritical. Why do you then have that "right?" That is you deciding who can own specific firearms, other than what the Bill of Rights prescribes. So shoplifters shouldn't have the right to self defense? How about jay-walkers? The Law is specific. Every class of 'people' is included; to not include all "people" would be an "infringement." Insuring "the security of a free State," is impossible if the State decides who is armed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
2nd Ammendment
Top