Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
280 Remington and Berger Classic Hunters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="trebark" data-source="post: 977463" data-attributes="member: 19172"><p>Like you, we originally loaded the 168s with H4831 but the best velocity we could get was 2700ish before we started to get ejector marks. Because we still had some case capacity, we thought, why not try H1000?? So we ran some quickload data to obtain a charge weight range. Of course the rifle performs well at a max load. With a 24" barrel 2800 is about as fast as you're going to get the 168s going. BTW, we tested both the VLD and the Hybrid. Velocities were similar but the consistent accuracy of the Hybrid made it the better choice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="trebark, post: 977463, member: 19172"] Like you, we originally loaded the 168s with H4831 but the best velocity we could get was 2700ish before we started to get ejector marks. Because we still had some case capacity, we thought, why not try H1000?? So we ran some quickload data to obtain a charge weight range. Of course the rifle performs well at a max load. With a 24" barrel 2800 is about as fast as you're going to get the 168s going. BTW, we tested both the VLD and the Hybrid. Velocities were similar but the consistent accuracy of the Hybrid made it the better choice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
280 Remington and Berger Classic Hunters
Top