Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 834918" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p>You sir is a better man for accepting the fact and more importantly recognizing the fault.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f258/lara3ec/Like_zps00ba1bd0.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>I originally considered .280 AI but went for .270 AI instead and couldn't be happier. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 834918, member: 14204"] You sir is a better man for accepting the fact and more importantly recognizing the fault. [IMG]http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f258/lara3ec/Like_zps00ba1bd0.jpg[/IMG] I originally considered .280 AI but went for .270 AI instead and couldn't be happier. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top