Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FEENIX" data-source="post: 834643" data-attributes="member: 14204"><p>Just curious what kind of pressure you guys generated with the load that caused it to flatten the primers. </p><p></p><p>Almost 3 years ago I loaded for a friend, he had a Ruger M77 MKII in .280 Rem that was accurized and AI'd by Brad Stair of <a href="http://www.wasatchprecisionarms.com/" target="_blank">Wasatch Precision Arms</a> (WPA) in UT. The hottest load was 60gr of H4831SC, 140gr NAB, BR2, using Nosler .280 AI virgin brass, and .005" off the lands. No pressure signs, no flatten primers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FEENIX, post: 834643, member: 14204"] Just curious what kind of pressure you guys generated with the load that caused it to flatten the primers. Almost 3 years ago I loaded for a friend, he had a Ruger M77 MKII in .280 Rem that was accurized and AI'd by Brad Stair of [URL="http://www.wasatchprecisionarms.com/"]Wasatch Precision Arms[/URL] (WPA) in UT. The hottest load was 60gr of H4831SC, 140gr NAB, BR2, using Nosler .280 AI virgin brass, and .005" off the lands. No pressure signs, no flatten primers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.280 AI controversy explained ...
Top