Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
277 fury
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wild Monkey" data-source="post: 2187474" data-attributes="member: 103097"><p>Now that more info is available we know: Base of Case could last five times more reloadings than normal brass. 80k psi is conservative to moderate as saami seems more concerned with Rifle failure at 80 k, modern steel design is not screwed together and indeed offers generous volume increase not decrease, 3000 was indeed a 16" barrel as those were the requirements by the Army. Now we or I have to embrace this new tech. For example this case could bump Creedmoor or 260 performance 200 fps. Since we aren't concerned with piercing body armor this could lead to endless possibilities for improved accuracy in civilian shooting circles. So yes, I Vote a definitely yes for 277 FURY! // As far inflated cost estimates the 9mm luger two piece case is more akin to one third the cost of comparative all brass cases. So I would expect to see considerable cost savings down the line on this case as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wild Monkey, post: 2187474, member: 103097"] Now that more info is available we know: Base of Case could last five times more reloadings than normal brass. 80k psi is conservative to moderate as saami seems more concerned with Rifle failure at 80 k, modern steel design is not screwed together and indeed offers generous volume increase not decrease, 3000 was indeed a 16" barrel as those were the requirements by the Army. Now we or I have to embrace this new tech. For example this case could bump Creedmoor or 260 performance 200 fps. Since we aren't concerned with piercing body armor this could lead to endless possibilities for improved accuracy in civilian shooting circles. So yes, I Vote a definitely yes for 277 FURY! // As far inflated cost estimates the 9mm luger two piece case is more akin to one third the cost of comparative all brass cases. So I would expect to see considerable cost savings down the line on this case as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
277 fury
Top