Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.270wcf vs 6.8 Western & 270 WSM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Capt RB" data-source="post: 2070117" data-attributes="member: 85987"><p>Running Rl26 and a longer coal I'm at max in the berger's book with my top velocities where it shoots well is .5 or more below that. And every bullet is at a higher velocity than what is now on the hodgdon site for all of their powders.</p><p>THe above chart showsa coal less than 3.4 for the 170. I'm at 3.395 for the 140. Move that out to 3.5-3.6 and you would pick up 50-75fps with less pressure than what they are seeing at the posted if the barrel is throated for that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Capt RB, post: 2070117, member: 85987"] Running Rl26 and a longer coal I'm at max in the berger's book with my top velocities where it shoots well is .5 or more below that. And every bullet is at a higher velocity than what is now on the hodgdon site for all of their powders. THe above chart showsa coal less than 3.4 for the 170. I'm at 3.395 for the 140. Move that out to 3.5-3.6 and you would pick up 50-75fps with less pressure than what they are seeing at the posted if the barrel is throated for that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.270wcf vs 6.8 Western & 270 WSM
Top