Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
270 wsm & 165 matrix
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sedancowboy" data-source="post: 1617502" data-attributes="member: 85874"><p>I would not disagree with you. Hornady's 10th addition manual on page 38 list H1000 as #148, RL-26 as #151 and Retumbo as #153. I know in my 28 Nosler I run one grain less of RL-26 to get +75fps more than Retumbo. In My 270 WSM with a long throat I run about the same charge of powder with H-1000 and RL-26 and the Rl-26 gives more velocity. As to burn rate I have no way of measuring it. I also read somewhere that RL-26 burns in 16" of barrel length where as the same article stated that H-1000 was over 20". Based on the above one would "***/u/me" that RL-26 was faster than H-1000 but I am not sure that common sense applies here there may be more science behind it than we know. Maybe some with more knowledge than I will chime in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sedancowboy, post: 1617502, member: 85874"] I would not disagree with you. Hornady's 10th addition manual on page 38 list H1000 as #148, RL-26 as #151 and Retumbo as #153. I know in my 28 Nosler I run one grain less of RL-26 to get +75fps more than Retumbo. In My 270 WSM with a long throat I run about the same charge of powder with H-1000 and RL-26 and the Rl-26 gives more velocity. As to burn rate I have no way of measuring it. I also read somewhere that RL-26 burns in 16" of barrel length where as the same article stated that H-1000 was over 20". Based on the above one would "***/u/me" that RL-26 was faster than H-1000 but I am not sure that common sense applies here there may be more science behind it than we know. Maybe some with more knowledge than I will chime in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
270 wsm & 165 matrix
Top