Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
270 Win ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnnyk" data-source="post: 1717374" data-attributes="member: 307"><p>30-35yrs ago, when I first started this reloading and LR thing, the .270 Winchester was the standard by which most cartridges were measured against and compared to for Long Range ballistics!</p><p>Sure you had the 7mmRemMag and .30WinMag, and both outperformed the .270, but if a cartridge was being evaluated there was a .270 thrown in for comparison.</p><p>I shot one for years, killed a lot of deer with it and have recently acquired another. The only thing the .270 ever lacked was the availability of better bullets and a longer barrel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnnyk, post: 1717374, member: 307"] 30-35yrs ago, when I first started this reloading and LR thing, the .270 Winchester was the standard by which most cartridges were measured against and compared to for Long Range ballistics! Sure you had the 7mmRemMag and .30WinMag, and both outperformed the .270, but if a cartridge was being evaluated there was a .270 thrown in for comparison. I shot one for years, killed a lot of deer with it and have recently acquired another. The only thing the .270 ever lacked was the availability of better bullets and a longer barrel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
270 Win ?
Top