Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.270 the best?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Treeslug" data-source="post: 2015780" data-attributes="member: 115704"><p>I think Roy Weatherby would have liked me. I like his theory on fast bullets. I have one of his 378 Rino Rifles. Don't get crazy looking all over the internet for a Rino Rifle. That's just what I call mine. Bullet coefficients are the best for that particular caliber, but energy is good. A 300-grain bullet at 2,900 FPS, give or take, will use up a few foot-pounds of that energy on the deer, and then use the remaining 5,000 or so pounds up on the pine tree behind the deer. If the Pinetree is big enough, it will survive, but the deer will come home with me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Treeslug, post: 2015780, member: 115704"] I think Roy Weatherby would have liked me. I like his theory on fast bullets. I have one of his 378 Rino Rifles. Don't get crazy looking all over the internet for a Rino Rifle. That's just what I call mine. Bullet coefficients are the best for that particular caliber, but energy is good. A 300-grain bullet at 2,900 FPS, give or take, will use up a few foot-pounds of that energy on the deer, and then use the remaining 5,000 or so pounds up on the pine tree behind the deer. If the Pinetree is big enough, it will survive, but the deer will come home with me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
.270 the best?
Top