Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
264 Win Mag LR bullets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Laguna Freak" data-source="post: 1951512" data-attributes="member: 87188"><p>So. Y'all think the Berger Ballistics calcs are better / more accurate than the JBM Ballistics?</p><p></p><p>There are substantial differences in the data points used, Berger vs JBM. E.g. JBM wants length of plastic tip. Berger doesn't. Of course Berg bullets don't have a plastic tip. The plastic tip length is greater than the overall length delta between roughly equivalent Berg & ABLR bullets.</p><p></p><p>What makes Berger's calcs mo-betta???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Laguna Freak, post: 1951512, member: 87188"] So. Y’all think the Berger Ballistics calcs are better / more accurate than the JBM Ballistics? There are substantial differences in the data points used, Berger vs JBM. E.g. JBM wants length of plastic tip. Berger doesn’t. Of course Berg bullets don’t have a plastic tip. The plastic tip length is greater than the overall length delta between roughly equivalent Berg & ABLR bullets. What makes Berger’s calcs mo-betta??? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
264 Win Mag LR bullets
Top