Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bigngreen" data-source="post: 1776209" data-attributes="member: 13632"><p>I think what was said to the Creedmore being the 260 done right is spot on, the 260 came out of a time when we were not looking for heavy for cal long range bullets in a short action, it's too long with the current trend of bullets and throating for the 260 without tricks or compromising just a titch, all of these newer chamberings for the most part are just tuned up designs to match OUR shooting trends and the platforms were are choosing nothing more IMO!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bigngreen, post: 1776209, member: 13632"] I think what was said to the Creedmore being the 260 done right is spot on, the 260 came out of a time when we were not looking for heavy for cal long range bullets in a short action, it's too long with the current trend of bullets and throating for the 260 without tricks or compromising just a titch, all of these newer chamberings for the most part are just tuned up designs to match OUR shooting trends and the platforms were are choosing nothing more IMO! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
Top