Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZReed85" data-source="post: 1775789" data-attributes="member: 95775"><p>The new high bc extra long bullets are certainly more creedmoor friendly. </p><p>The 156 Berger is a little over 3 inches when seated optimally in a 260 remington... which is obviously a no go on a short action. </p><p></p><p>2.9ish seated optimally in a creed where I want a rifle throated. </p><p></p><p>I like a 260 but these ultra high bc bullets will be the final nail in the coffin im afraid. It's a just a dated design that time and technology have gotten ahead of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZReed85, post: 1775789, member: 95775"] The new high bc extra long bullets are certainly more creedmoor friendly. The 156 Berger is a little over 3 inches when seated optimally in a 260 remington... which is obviously a no go on a short action. 2.9ish seated optimally in a creed where I want a rifle throated. I like a 260 but these ultra high bc bullets will be the final nail in the coffin im afraid. It's a just a dated design that time and technology have gotten ahead of. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
Top