Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="codyadams" data-source="post: 1775380" data-attributes="member: 87243"><p>That is a somewhat off the wall question, I can't think of any brand of rifle, savage, remington, ruger, browning, tikka, ect. that I wouldn't modify at least a couple things in the process of setting up for consistent long range shooting.</p><p></p><p>That being said, Remington's QC does suck. However I have also personally experienced two different savages with chambers screwed up from the factory. So their QC is nothing to brag about either. A new Browning I worked on for a buddy was seriously picky about what it would shoot well. Every Ruger I have been around has been great, but again, some have been very picky about getting good accuracy, and my test pool has only been the M77's.</p><p></p><p>Pretty much what I'm saying, if it's a mass produced rifle it has the capacity to suck. Remington just doesn't know how to stabilize a bullet and has the marketing capacity of the little girl on the corner with a lemonade stand.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="codyadams, post: 1775380, member: 87243"] That is a somewhat off the wall question, I can't think of any brand of rifle, savage, remington, ruger, browning, tikka, ect. that I wouldn't modify at least a couple things in the process of setting up for consistent long range shooting. That being said, Remington's QC does suck. However I have also personally experienced two different savages with chambers screwed up from the factory. So their QC is nothing to brag about either. A new Browning I worked on for a buddy was seriously picky about what it would shoot well. Every Ruger I have been around has been great, but again, some have been very picky about getting good accuracy, and my test pool has only been the M77's. Pretty much what I'm saying, if it's a mass produced rifle it has the capacity to suck. Remington just doesn't know how to stabilize a bullet and has the marketing capacity of the little girl on the corner with a lemonade stand. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
.260 vs 6.5 Creedmore
Top