Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trickymissfit" data-source="post: 754858" data-attributes="member: 25383"><p>I suspect that there's more velocity still in the Sherman case! I may build a 6.5x57AI out of a .260 donor barrel just to actually see what it can do. I do know that the 7x57AI is a very efficient round, and is known to proce some serious velocities, but still never expect it to run with a .280 or the 6.5-06 family</p><p> </p><p>I've heard of guys loosing a 6.5/.284 barrel while doing load development! It's in the case design like nearly all Winchester case designs. Yet most guys will never admit this issue.</p><p>gary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trickymissfit, post: 754858, member: 25383"] I suspect that there's more velocity still in the Sherman case! I may build a 6.5x57AI out of a .260 donor barrel just to actually see what it can do. I do know that the 7x57AI is a very efficient round, and is known to proce some serious velocities, but still never expect it to run with a .280 or the 6.5-06 family I've heard of guys loosing a 6.5/.284 barrel while doing load development! It's in the case design like nearly all Winchester case designs. Yet most guys will never admit this issue. gary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
Top