Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael Eichele" data-source="post: 706171" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>+1. And add the fact of reduced windage and you have a winning combo.</p><p></p><p>I never thought I would see the day when I thought smaller was better.</p><p></p><p>Less recoil, more retained velocity, less drift. I can live with less energy found with 300 mags and such but with enough velocity for expansion, it is not nearly as important as it is made out to be. Expansion and penetration is where it is at.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael Eichele, post: 706171, member: 1007"] +1. And add the fact of reduced windage and you have a winning combo. I never thought I would see the day when I thought smaller was better. Less recoil, more retained velocity, less drift. I can live with less energy found with 300 mags and such but with enough velocity for expansion, it is not nearly as important as it is made out to be. Expansion and penetration is where it is at. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
Top