Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Clark" data-source="post: 1205489" data-attributes="member: 6600"><p>Quickload thinks my 50.7 gr should make 3236 fps with IMR4895 and it chronos at 3197 fps with 4166, so it is a little slower.</p><p></p><p>So far I have just used the 4166 in Oct 2015 on a new Krieger barrel 300WinMag 125 gr and this new 6.5-06 120 gr Shilen select match ratchet barrel 6.5-06.</p><p></p><p>So I have no controlled test, but it sure does seem to be easy to keep clean of Copper fouling.</p><p></p><p>So with the two anecdotes, I am a fan of IMR4166.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Clark, post: 1205489, member: 6600"] Quickload thinks my 50.7 gr should make 3236 fps with IMR4895 and it chronos at 3197 fps with 4166, so it is a little slower. So far I have just used the 4166 in Oct 2015 on a new Krieger barrel 300WinMag 125 gr and this new 6.5-06 120 gr Shilen select match ratchet barrel 6.5-06. So I have no controlled test, but it sure does seem to be easy to keep clean of Copper fouling. So with the two anecdotes, I am a fan of IMR4166. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
260 Rem Vs. 6.5-06
Top