Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
257 Weatherby vs. 6.5-06 vs. 6.5x284
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrentM" data-source="post: 889570" data-attributes="member: 61747"><p>What would the BC come to for a 130 .257? Seems like it might pretty decent. </p><p> </p><p>I am guessing it would put the 130 pill at about 3200 in a 24-26 barrel? If that is the case, would it still be a good choice compared to the other mags, SAUM, Dakota, WSM, etc that send a 140 at those speeds or a 160 at 3000-3200. </p><p> </p><p>Just curious, I know nothing about the .257's. Seems like a neat set up and more beef than a .243.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrentM, post: 889570, member: 61747"] What would the BC come to for a 130 .257? Seems like it might pretty decent. I am guessing it would put the 130 pill at about 3200 in a 24-26 barrel? If that is the case, would it still be a good choice compared to the other mags, SAUM, Dakota, WSM, etc that send a 140 at those speeds or a 160 at 3000-3200. Just curious, I know nothing about the .257's. Seems like a neat set up and more beef than a .243. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
257 Weatherby vs. 6.5-06 vs. 6.5x284
Top