Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
25-06 to 264 win mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Patton243" data-source="post: 1471102" data-attributes="member: 97417"><p>You're entitled to your opinion. However, the consensus is these are barrel burners. A 7 mag, which I have, is over bore. This thing is obviously more because it's based off the 7 mag necked down. I don't see anyone with a 264 win mag getting more than a 1000 rounds of accuracy. In contrast, a 6.5x284 will give you 1500-2000 rounds most likely, better brass, and a cartridge that has won 1000 yard competitions. Why change the bolt face and feedings rails too. Just another headache IMO. And short Fat cases are inherently more accurate. That's all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Patton243, post: 1471102, member: 97417"] You’re entitled to your opinion. However, the consensus is these are barrel burners. A 7 mag, which I have, is over bore. This thing is obviously more because it’s based off the 7 mag necked down. I don’t see anyone with a 264 win mag getting more than a 1000 rounds of accuracy. In contrast, a 6.5x284 will give you 1500-2000 rounds most likely, better brass, and a cartridge that has won 1000 yard competitions. Why change the bolt face and feedings rails too. Just another headache IMO. And short Fat cases are inherently more accurate. That’s all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
25-06 to 264 win mag
Top