Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
22 RF "Long Range" ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Perkules" data-source="post: 32619" data-attributes="member: 945"><p>Yeah,these CZ:s shoot nice for the price.</p><p></p><p>I took my 338 LM trajectory up to 1500 and this up to 300 for comparision on paper, the compensation for the elevation is almost identical all the way when .22 is zeroed at 75 and 338 at 300. </p><p></p><p>Just scale it down,100 is 500, 200 is 1000 and 300 is 1500. </p><p></p><p>Like, in halfway (150 yds for 22 or 750 yds for 338 ) both need +13 MOA . And 200 yds for the 22 is about the same as 1000 yds for the 338, needs +23 MOA, at 250 it equals to 1250, needing +37 MOA, 300 is the same as 1500 with +50 MOA... </p><p></p><p>I have a + 20 MOA shim,luckily. </p><p></p><p>25 yards equals to 125,needing -3.5 MOA, 50 yards needs -2 and that´s equal to 250... goes bad around 100 but not big time... took me a while to compose the BC for the Super-X and figure out the zeros and stuff, this should be pretty close now. This didn´t work out with the 225 trajectory but the 300 is nice. </p><p></p><p>Time to print some fun targets soon - and find more Super-X -man, I heard a rumour they aren´t imported anymore because of some "Hollow Point Ammo Ban"... go figure.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Sometimes I wonder how I´m really doing? <img src="http://images/icons/shocked.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Perkules, post: 32619, member: 945"] Yeah,these CZ:s shoot nice for the price. I took my 338 LM trajectory up to 1500 and this up to 300 for comparision on paper, the compensation for the elevation is almost identical all the way when .22 is zeroed at 75 and 338 at 300. Just scale it down,100 is 500, 200 is 1000 and 300 is 1500. Like, in halfway (150 yds for 22 or 750 yds for 338 ) both need +13 MOA . And 200 yds for the 22 is about the same as 1000 yds for the 338, needs +23 MOA, at 250 it equals to 1250, needing +37 MOA, 300 is the same as 1500 with +50 MOA... I have a + 20 MOA shim,luckily. 25 yards equals to 125,needing -3.5 MOA, 50 yards needs -2 and that´s equal to 250... goes bad around 100 but not big time... took me a while to compose the BC for the Super-X and figure out the zeros and stuff, this should be pretty close now. This didn´t work out with the 225 trajectory but the 300 is nice. Time to print some fun targets soon - and find more Super-X -man, I heard a rumour they aren´t imported anymore because of some "Hollow Point Ammo Ban"... go figure. Sometimes I wonder how I´m really doing? [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
22 RF "Long Range" ?
Top