Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
208 gr. AMAX vs. 200 gr. SMK from 300winmag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gohring3006" data-source="post: 1071947" data-attributes="member: 78762"><p>I haven't tried either on game, but I would suspect the 200 SMK might be unreliable, the reason I say this is its a tangent ogive design, and it might implode into its self because of the nose shape. And sometime it might not. I do know its a very accurate bullet and I think Litz actually found the BC to be higher than advertised Sierra list it at .56 and Litz found it was .58 I'm going off of memory here, but I think this is the case.</p><p> As for the 208 Amax I have nothing but good to say about it. I haven't used it on game either, but extremely accurate. I would suspect it would be good for long range, the polymer tip would initiate expansion at lower velocities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gohring3006, post: 1071947, member: 78762"] I haven't tried either on game, but I would suspect the 200 SMK might be unreliable, the reason I say this is its a tangent ogive design, and it might implode into its self because of the nose shape. And sometime it might not. I do know its a very accurate bullet and I think Litz actually found the BC to be higher than advertised Sierra list it at .56 and Litz found it was .58 I'm going off of memory here, but I think this is the case. As for the 208 Amax I have nothing but good to say about it. I haven't used it on game either, but extremely accurate. I would suspect it would be good for long range, the polymer tip would initiate expansion at lower velocities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
208 gr. AMAX vs. 200 gr. SMK from 300winmag
Top