Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
2005 Wildcat Bullets Price List.....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3sixbits" data-source="post: 68782" data-attributes="member: 3661"><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p> <a href="http://wildcatbullets.com/" target="_blank">wildcatBullets</a> </p><p>Can folks do a quick reality check of what I have put together (quick and dirty). All the data will eventually go into a DB but I would like to know what columns are important (I added OAL)</p><p></p><p>What do you think is the best way to list bullets, by calibre and weight (as I did with the .224) or as Richard did by calibre,weight, Jacket (like I did with the 6mm)?</p><p></p><p>I borrowed Jon A's pic, hope that is OK (until I get some myself).</p><p></p><p>I just work on this a few minutes every other day as I have time. </p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ] Hey, my comments where not meant to rebuke anyone and I think you guys have done a fine job for Richard. That was not the point of the discussion it was only for or to point out the differences between the two types of bullets. I've only spent an hour or two on the phone with Richard. I'll tell you just like I told Richard, as a bullet maker myself, I would much rather shoot someone Else's bullets than make my own! I'm just like the rest of you guys I'm waiting on my bullets from Richard. We had a long discussion about how hard it is to get good jackets. The dies and technique are one issue, good jackets are a whole nother ball game. We talked long and hard about the people in the business of making bullets, the good the bad and the ugly of the die makers. As a personnel aside to this bullet making issue I can state that Richard does it right with these thick jackets and the bonded cores that is why I have many hundred on order with him! I'm a big proponent of Woodliegh Bullets as anyone who has read my posts knows, I believe that Richards bullets will work the same. No I don't buy bullets to kill paper! Richard will tell you if you ask that he makes bullets for hunters, that they work so well on paper is OK but he wants them to work on the real thing. Remember the name of this web site? Or is it longrange paperpunchers.com? There is just one hell of a lot of also ran bullets out there, you pays your money and you takes your chances. Richard is the real deal! I say this with some twenty plus years of bullet making under my belt. I told Richard that I did not know why all bullet makers did not list the length of there bullets, I'm vary glad to see that it has been added. I believe the shooters on this site can benefit from that information. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK FOR RICHARD. <strong>We benefit from it !</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3sixbits, post: 68782, member: 3661"] [ QUOTE ] [url="http://wildcatbullets.com/"]wildcatBullets[/url] Can folks do a quick reality check of what I have put together (quick and dirty). All the data will eventually go into a DB but I would like to know what columns are important (I added OAL) What do you think is the best way to list bullets, by calibre and weight (as I did with the .224) or as Richard did by calibre,weight, Jacket (like I did with the 6mm)? I borrowed Jon A's pic, hope that is OK (until I get some myself). I just work on this a few minutes every other day as I have time. [/ QUOTE ] Hey, my comments where not meant to rebuke anyone and I think you guys have done a fine job for Richard. That was not the point of the discussion it was only for or to point out the differences between the two types of bullets. I've only spent an hour or two on the phone with Richard. I'll tell you just like I told Richard, as a bullet maker myself, I would much rather shoot someone Else's bullets than make my own! I'm just like the rest of you guys I'm waiting on my bullets from Richard. We had a long discussion about how hard it is to get good jackets. The dies and technique are one issue, good jackets are a whole nother ball game. We talked long and hard about the people in the business of making bullets, the good the bad and the ugly of the die makers. As a personnel aside to this bullet making issue I can state that Richard does it right with these thick jackets and the bonded cores that is why I have many hundred on order with him! I'm a big proponent of Woodliegh Bullets as anyone who has read my posts knows, I believe that Richards bullets will work the same. No I don't buy bullets to kill paper! Richard will tell you if you ask that he makes bullets for hunters, that they work so well on paper is OK but he wants them to work on the real thing. Remember the name of this web site? Or is it longrange paperpunchers.com? There is just one hell of a lot of also ran bullets out there, you pays your money and you takes your chances. Richard is the real deal! I say this with some twenty plus years of bullet making under my belt. I told Richard that I did not know why all bullet makers did not list the length of there bullets, I'm vary glad to see that it has been added. I believe the shooters on this site can benefit from that information. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK FOR RICHARD. [b]We benefit from it ![/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
2005 Wildcat Bullets Price List.....
Top