Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
200 gr Part vs Accubond Max-Loads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Varmint Hunter" data-source="post: 315245" data-attributes="member: 313"><p>I'm not in favor of compressed loads. Some shooters claim that compressed loads "can" push the bullet partially out over time, thus, have several bullets with different oal. I believe that powder could change its burning characteristic if (overly) crushed by compression.</p><p></p><p>Is there a reason that you can't just load the Accubond to a longer oal?</p><p></p><p>Personally, if I was going to use that brass, I'd consider a faster powder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Varmint Hunter, post: 315245, member: 313"] I'm not in favor of compressed loads. Some shooters claim that compressed loads "can" push the bullet partially out over time, thus, have several bullets with different oal. I believe that powder could change its burning characteristic if (overly) crushed by compression. Is there a reason that you can't just load the Accubond to a longer oal? Personally, if I was going to use that brass, I'd consider a faster powder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
200 gr Part vs Accubond Max-Loads
Top