Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
20” 300 PRC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David Emerson" data-source="post: 1804744" data-attributes="member: 112579"><p>So 145 ft for 4 inches. 35 ft per inch. That is in line with normal. If I remember right it gets down to about 25 or so as you get longer. Being we are having this discussion I am curious about something. Let,s use a 300 weatherby for an example. Why is it a 24 inch gun has so much more blast and fireball than a 26? If all the powder was burned the muzzle pressure should not be much different. Correct? And if all the powder was burned why so much more muzzle flash? The 264 was really bad for that. Cut one shorter and you have a noisy 270 win.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David Emerson, post: 1804744, member: 112579"] So 145 ft for 4 inches. 35 ft per inch. That is in line with normal. If I remember right it gets down to about 25 or so as you get longer. Being we are having this discussion I am curious about something. Let,s use a 300 weatherby for an example. Why is it a 24 inch gun has so much more blast and fireball than a 26? If all the powder was burned the muzzle pressure should not be much different. Correct? And if all the powder was burned why so much more muzzle flash? The 264 was really bad for that. Cut one shorter and you have a noisy 270 win. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
20” 300 PRC
Top