Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
168gr vs 178gr In a Shorter Barrel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedRanger328" data-source="post: 2215840" data-attributes="member: 118838"><p>So how I'd want to go about this, is test shots over a Chrono, get an average speed, and check to see if I've got the velocity on the bullet at whatever range using a ballistic calculator under various conditions, is that about right?</p><p></p><p>I've currently got IMR 4064 stockpiled, and with what I'm reading, I actually want a faster burning powder, but that's gonna be a bit difficult. I've got 178 gr ELD-Ms on hand, but not the 168s.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedRanger328, post: 2215840, member: 118838"] So how I'd want to go about this, is test shots over a Chrono, get an average speed, and check to see if I've got the velocity on the bullet at whatever range using a ballistic calculator under various conditions, is that about right? I've currently got IMR 4064 stockpiled, and with what I'm reading, I actually want a faster burning powder, but that's gonna be a bit difficult. I've got 178 gr ELD-Ms on hand, but not the 168s. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
168gr vs 178gr In a Shorter Barrel
Top