Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 gr Scirocco vs 140 gr TSX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rost495" data-source="post: 34554" data-attributes="member: 1768"><p>No exit. Just what one would expect from a ballistic tip type bullet. </p><p></p><p>With X bullets the only one I've ever seen recovered was a 416 -400X into an Eland. Shot in the rump, recovered under the skin in the neck. All others have exited from any angle.</p><p></p><p>Thats the reason to use an X bullet.</p><p></p><p>Shooting high in the body is never good though. Watched a caribou get shot twice last year at over 300 yards. Both high shots. Both total penetration but just kills slow. Got down and finshed him with a 44 airweight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rost495, post: 34554, member: 1768"] No exit. Just what one would expect from a ballistic tip type bullet. With X bullets the only one I've ever seen recovered was a 416 -400X into an Eland. Shot in the rump, recovered under the skin in the neck. All others have exited from any angle. Thats the reason to use an X bullet. Shooting high in the body is never good though. Watched a caribou get shot twice last year at over 300 yards. Both high shots. Both total penetration but just kills slow. Got down and finshed him with a 44 airweight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
150 gr Scirocco vs 140 gr TSX
Top