Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
131 Blackjack vs 135 Berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ross1147" data-source="post: 2244726" data-attributes="member: 106919"><p>Just wanted to post this up if anyone was curious on how they compare. Overall they look pretty similar, with the BJ (on the small sample size I took) being ~.002" longer. </p><p>In my 25SST the CBTO measurement to the lands was 2.180" for both bullets. I have a ladder loaded up with N565 and the 135 I'm going to test this weekend. Loaded with a .002" jump COAL on the 135 Berger is 2.858". That would put the COAL at the lands right at 2.86". I'll post my results when I get back!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ross1147, post: 2244726, member: 106919"] Just wanted to post this up if anyone was curious on how they compare. Overall they look pretty similar, with the BJ (on the small sample size I took) being ~.002” longer. In my 25SST the CBTO measurement to the lands was 2.180” for both bullets. I have a ladder loaded up with N565 and the 135 I’m going to test this weekend. Loaded with a .002” jump COAL on the 135 Berger is 2.858”. That would put the COAL at the lands right at 2.86”. I’ll post my results when I get back! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
131 Blackjack vs 135 Berger
Top