So far, everyone who has an opinion on the .223 Wylde has intoned that it is a more accurate barrel chambering over the 5.56x45 or .223 Rem.
However, once I ask where can I review any serious documentation to support this assertion of the .223 Wylde's superiority, then incredulous sputtering and indignational responses are the normal responses. I even inquired this of the Brownell's and Midway's "technical" staff, but my inquiries were not productive at all.
Can anyone point me to documented and controlled tests or studies that prove the .223 Wylde is superior in innate accuracy over the 5.56 and .223 Rem? (assuming equivalent barrel crowns were used on each barrel, etc)
However, once I ask where can I review any serious documentation to support this assertion of the .223 Wylde's superiority, then incredulous sputtering and indignational responses are the normal responses. I even inquired this of the Brownell's and Midway's "technical" staff, but my inquiries were not productive at all.
Can anyone point me to documented and controlled tests or studies that prove the .223 Wylde is superior in innate accuracy over the 5.56 and .223 Rem? (assuming equivalent barrel crowns were used on each barrel, etc)