dfanonymous
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2016
- Messages
- 2,267
Most of the elk,deer,bear and wolves I hunt are not in support of an assault team I understand you enjoy that training and style of engagement but for long range hunting, I'm not exactly sure how that pertains. Military schools are not the end all be all, which I'm sure you agree. Ask me how I know
What is funny about aiming for the kill zone on an animal?
25x and under is probably most people on this forum. 10x is a big difference and it is true that more magnification leads to better accuracy. Agreed?
The fact that it's implied that you aim for vitals. No one is reinventing the wheel here.
No it's not true. So NOT agreed. specifically for the reasons I listed above as to not repeat myself.
Most of the elk,deer,bear and wolves I hunt are not in support of an assault team I understand you enjoy that training and style of engagement but for long range hunting, I'm not exactly sure how that pertains. Military schools are not the end all be all, which I'm sure you agree. Ask me how I know
I'm not trying to sell you the training, it's there and it works. A lead on a target is a lead on a target period. I do agree that they are end all be all, but when did experience stop counting for something?
field conditions and talking life there is a complete correlation in that aspect. Same as effectiveness to be able to do so. Based on this conversation I almost don't care what you think you know. I could already tell you were booty tickled by the mere fact I mentioned bench rest guys are always going to want more magnification. You're type are the only ones who argue this.