Anyone using a March FX 4.5-28X52?

Huntnful said:
Thanks man!! It is a tough dilemma!! I probably researched scopes for a 100 hours before I actually made a decision lol. How are you liking the TT?!
Click to expand...
It's good. I like it. The fact that the turret has zero chance of moving unintentionally was a big thing for me.
 

Attachments

  • 5E0FC4BA-6E33-4DF6-9857-F3442E3B0EA9.jpeg
    5E0FC4BA-6E33-4DF6-9857-F3442E3B0EA9.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 139
Thanks man lol
I may end up putting a march on my 300 norma so let me know what your think of that scope when you get it
 
lancetkenyon said:
March FX vs TT315M

1. More top end magnification
2. More elevation adjustment
3.
4.
Yeah, that is it...
Click to expand...
Yes I have the non illuminated version and it's 28 even.
I hear excellent things about the TT 315 but I really don't want a scope in that weight/price range that tops out at 15x, in my opinion that's a huge setback compared to the March.
Also the FOV with the fx 4.5-28 is really impressive, I didn't think much of it until I compared it to my mk5 5-25 at various ranges throughout the magnification range
 
There is nothing wrong with the March FX. If it suits your needs better than the TT, by all means, get it. I don't own one, just have shot behind two. I seriously considered one for a while. I had an F 3-24×52 for a couple years, but eventually sold it to buy another TT. The FX is a better scope than the F, however.

I just prefer the TT for myself. I have four of them. I have hunted a lot with them. And I shoot a couple of them out to 1500+ at least once a month. The only thing that limits me is on my 6CM, I run out of elevation adjustment at 1400 yards. So I dial, then add holdover for 1500 yards.
 
lancetkenyon said:
There is nothing wrong with the March FX. If it suits your needs better than the TT, by all means, get it. I don't own one, just have shot behind two. I seriously considered one for a while. I had an F 3-24×52 for a couple years, but eventually sold it to buy another TT. The FX is a better scope than the F, however.

I just prefer the TT for myself. I have four of them. I have hunted a lot with them. And I shoot a couple of them out to 1500+ at least once a month. The only thing that limits me is on my 6CM, I run out of elevation adjustment at 1400 yards. So I dial, then add holdover for 1500 yards.
Click to expand...
Nice!! I also looked hard at that 3-24X52 but couldn't get over the uncapped windage for some reason lol. Are you using the original 315M's or the 315 LRH?
 
lancetkenyon said:
still a little picky getting the diopter set up and perfect with the parallax.
Click to expand...
I have an older 2.5-25x. Love the weight; tracks true, but optics on mine are not close to NF. What I really don't like about it is the parallax - much easier to see mirage with by manipulating parallax adjustment with a NF than the March.

The other issue with March is the warranty. I had mine on a heavy AR that I knocked off the rifle stand in my loading room; bent the objective bell. March charged me $700 to repair it.
 
LRNut said:
I have an older 2.5-25x. Love the weight; tracks true, but optics on mine are not close to NF. What I really don't like about it is the parallax - much easier to see mirage with by manipulating parallax adjustment with a NF than the March.

The other issue with March is the warranty. I had mine on a heavy AR that I knocked off the rifle stand in my loading room; bent the objective bell. March charged me $700 to repair it.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the info!!
 

Similar threads

Huntnful
March FX 4.5-28X52 Review (So Far)
5 6 7
Replies
87
Views
13K
bsnyder
B
Huntnful
March FX 4.5-28X52 Initial Impressions & turret video.
2 3 4
Replies
53
Views
5K
Huntnful
Huntnful
7
Killer deal March FX 4.5-28
Replies
1
Views
534
Hand Skills
Hand Skills
muleystalker
March 3-24x42mmFFP anyone use one?
Replies
3
Views
749
Rocky Mountain
R
lancetkenyon
March FX 1.5-15x42 Dual Plane
Replies
4
Views
749
Hotmail
H

Recent Posts

Top