Zeiss Victory RF 10x45 Rangefinder Binocular Review

Discussion in 'Product Reviews - Discussion' started by ADMIN, Oct 14, 2008.

  1. ADMIN

    ADMIN Administrator

    Messages:
    1,140
    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
  2. royinidaho

    royinidaho Writers Guild

    Messages:
    8,853
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Gee whizzicers, Len:rolleyes: That was a costly review. It really got my dream wheel spinning up.

    When you say 1300 yd published range is conservative and mention the pine tree @ 1485? What's your definition of conservative?

    Just reread the article. Ignore the question. Answered by "first I've seen from a manufacturer."
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2008

  3. Len Backus

    Len Backus Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,343
    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Well, it already ranged past the stated range...in bright sunlight. I wish I had some quality time with it to see how it would do with deer poking up out of a sage brush field. But...color problem for me.

    If not for my color issue I was going to buy one from SWFA.
     
  4. royinidaho

    royinidaho Writers Guild

    Messages:
    8,853
    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    I appreciate the color thing.......

    I'm thinkin' the monocular will work as only my right eye is up to snuff. That is until the cataract gets removed from the lefty next spring:rolleyes:

    They also have a pretty nifty 10X60 S and BS, whatever S and BS mean, that for a few bucks look super good to replace a bino.
     
  5. Spk

    Spk New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    I'm tryng to decide between the Victory FL 10x42 without rangefinder, and the RF 10x45. THere's almost a grand difference which I don't mind paying as long as the image quality is at least the same.

    Dess the RF model use the same prisms and coatings as the 8x42, in which case would it be somewhat better in light gathering performance because of the larger objective?

    Thanks for sharing your opinions/knowledge.
     
  6. Len Backus

    Len Backus Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,343
    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    spk, sorry I don't know but I'll try to get an answer.
     
  7. Len Backus

    Len Backus Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,343
    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Chris Farris of SWFA says:
     
  8. Spk

    Spk New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Thanks. Good info.

    The RF model is also much heavier so everything comes at a price beyond $$$.
     
  9. rhinoridr

    rhinoridr New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Hi, how does the zeiss victory RF 10x45 range finder compare to the Leica BRF 10x42 range finder:)
     
  10. Len Backus

    Len Backus Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,343
    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    rhinoidr

    I have not had a chance to compare them in the field.
     
  11. NZ Longranger

    NZ Longranger Writers Guild

    Messages:
    225
    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2007
    I'm doing a review of the Zeiss RF's in NZ Hunter at the moment. We've been using them hunting for the last few weeks, and I've done a lot of testing and comparisons.

    All in all, the Zeiss RF's are proving to be the most user friendly, quickest to get a range, have far and away the best daylight ranging capabilities, and have very good optics. They are the best eye safe hunting rangefinder on the market at the moment.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2008
  12. DocH97

    DocH97 New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    So how is the testing going? I am trying to decide whether to go with the Leica Geovids or the Zeiss RF's. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated!!!
     
  13. britz

    britz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,217
    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Len, Thanks for the review. Wow, I was pretty sick in the belly when you said it was available for around $700. I just bought a Leica crf for 699 a few months ago and I wasn't excited about it's performance, but content. I was a little releived when I saw the SWFA price to be in the thousands rather than the hundereds lol!
     
  14. Len Backus

    Len Backus Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    6,343
    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Britz, you understand that the $700 is for the non-binocular version, right?