Vortex Razor HD - 2014

Discussion in 'Long Range Scopes and Other Optics' started by Rockfish Dave, Dec 8, 2013.

  1. Rockfish Dave

    Rockfish Dave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=1&theater




    [​IMG]

    There are two but the 4.5-27x56 is pictured.

    3-18x50- approx $2299 MAP

    4.5-27x56- $2499 MAP - pictured


    • 10 mil rev elevation, w/ rotation indicator on knob
    • Over 100 MOA of travel
    • locking turrets (both turrets) Pop up
    • Windage is 6-7mils each way
    • 34mm tubes
    • Both FFP

    MTC as an aftermarket option
     
  2. Rockfish Dave

    Rockfish Dave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008

  3. Rockfish Dave

    Rockfish Dave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Vortex 4.5-27x56 Razor HD Gen II 34mm Rifle Scope
    Stock # - VORRZR42704
    •EBR-1C Reticle (MRAD)
    •34mm
    •First Focal Plane
    •Side Focus
    •.1 Mrad
    •10 MILS Per Revolution

    Vortex 4.5-27x56 Razor HD Gen II 34mm Rifle Scope
    Stock # - VORRZR42706
    •EBR-2C Reticle (MRAD)
    •34mm
    •First Focal Plane
    •Side Focus
    •.1 Mrad
    •10 MILS Per Revolution

    Vortex 4.5-27x56 Razor HD Gen II 34mm Rifle Scope
    Stock # - VORRZR42705
    •EBR-2C Reticle (MOA)
    •34mm
    •First Focal Plane
    •Side Focus
    •1/4 MOA
    •25 MOA Per Revolution

    Click for high res image.
    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  4. varmintH8R

    varmintH8R Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    They look very nice. Much more streamlined than the current Razors. I would say the MSRP reflects that.

    Any word on where they are made? I would have an issue with a $2K+ scope that is made anywhere other than the US, Western Europe, or Japan. I have a Vortex Razor spotter, and I love it - BUT - you can tell the fit/finish/controls are not up to par with the Euro glass. For the spotter, the price reflects this, and is IMO a fair trade off.

    For a $2K+ riflescope, it would be harder to swallow as there is some excellent glass in this price range.
     
  5. cummins cowboy

    cummins cowboy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    291
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    will someone please tell me why anyone needs a 34mm tube??
     
  6. varmintH8R

    varmintH8R Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
    I think the only benefit is increased room for elevation travel. Definitely has value to those shooting ELR.
     
  7. cummins cowboy

    cummins cowboy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    291
    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    an extra 18 MOA gets me less than 200 yards from my 243 ai 1700 to 1900 yards. I have never heard of anyone needing that much elevation travel.
     
  8. varmintH8R

    varmintH8R Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2011
  9. osoh

    osoh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2013

    Every rifle system is different as well as what is required of it. As far as elevation corrections they differ from shooter, DA and goals as far as distance.

    The larger dia. tube allows for maximum erector tube travel and light transition, both being only a small amounts of gain. But in the end all the little things added up and make a difference.

    The 5-20x50 Razor has been a 35mm from the start years ago, as well as other companies running 34, 35 and 36mm tubes as well.

    Looking at the complete line of Vortex scopes, they cover about every type of needs for short range, long range hunters, plinkers, sport shooters, F class, tactical to the hard use service and extended long range shooters


    Cheers
     
  10. Fiftydriver

    Fiftydriver <strong>Official LRH Sponsor</strong>

    Messages:
    6,848
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    The larger tube also allows larger diameter lenses internally which helps with light transmission as well as allowing more vertical adjustment ranges.
     
  11. Fiftydriver

    Fiftydriver <strong>Official LRH Sponsor</strong>

    Messages:
    6,848
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004

    I will try to be as polite as possible and in no way am I trying to insult you in any way but there are a couple points that need to be made here in regard to your comments above.

    1. Your 243 AI is in no way a 1700 to 1900 yard rifle so in YOUR case, your right, you have no use for a scope like this other then its potential to have great optical quality, great consistency at any range.

    2. If you have never heard of anyone needed 34 mils worth of vertical adjustment, you really need to educate yourself and see what we are doing these days at some true long range shooting. This is LONG RANGE HUNTING, not NORMAL RANGE HUNTING.com

    You need to realize the playground your playing at. There are hundreds of us on this site alone that use all of this adjustment range and then some OFTEN.

    You also need to realize that any scope system will be at its peak optical performance in the middle 50% of its adjustment range. 75% of the center of that adjustment range is likely good enough that you will never be able to tell a difference but if you have to adjust to the outer limits of a scopes adjustment range, you will see the difference in optical quality as well as how forgiving the scope is as far as eye position for full field of view to some degree or another. This is also effected by the overall quality of the scope but all are effected to some degree at the outer limits of their adjustment ranges.

    So, if you have a 30mm scope tubed scope with 70 moa of total adjustment range, at the outer limits of the effective range of your rifle, you may have to adjust your scope out of its optimum optical range of adjustment.

    Now, that is not to say that most will notice the optical change when a scope is out of their optimum adjustment range as far as optical quality but the larger the scope adjustment range, the larger the window of optimum optical quality in the adjustment range.

    So by you saying you have never heard of anyone needing a scope like this..... I suggest you do some more research and see what is actually happening today in the Long range and Extreme Long range shooting sports. Its quite amazing whats going on. In fact, often times, even with scopes like this, we need 40 or even 60 moa canted rail bases and we even then reach the limits of vertical adjustment ranges.

    I have even used adjustable rings that have a built in 150 moa of adjustment on a 40 moa rail base with a scope that has +120 moa of vertical adjustment and in some situations, its a perfect combination and certainly needed!!!

    Just wanting to do some polite educating so you understand what some are doing out in the Extreme Long Range shooting fields....

    Looking at the 243 AI for example, say you are driving a 105 gr berger VLD with a BC of roughly .55 G1 to 3100 fps which is pretty standard load for a 243 AI with this bullet weight in a long barreled rifle, with a 100 yard zero, you will need a dial up of around 68 moa at 1800 yards which will be the limit of your supersonic velocity at around 3500 ft elevation. That means that to be able to dial up to that 1800 yard zero, even if you have a 20 moa rail base, you will need a scope with at least a 100 moa total adjustment range since in a perfect world, if your rifle is zeroed at 100 yards, it should be as close to its mechanical zero as possible.

    That means you have 50 moa of adjustment range on the top half of your scopes adjustment range after zeroing your rifle. Add in your 20 moa rail base and that gives you 70 moa of usible adjustment range. So in your case, you need a rifle with 100 moa of vertical adjustment range to get your rifle to dial up to an 1800 yard zero.

    Now, there are not a lot of scopes that offer 100 moa of vertical adjustment ranges that do not cost at least $1000. There are some but they are very few. The NF NXS scopes easily do this but even with them, your at the outer limits of their adjustment range to dail up out to 1800 yards with your 243 AI so again, in your case, your right, YOU have no need for anything more then the best 30mm scopes.

    That said, the best long range weapon systems out there, namely the best 338 super magnums out there such as my 338 Allen Magnum have the potential to drive a 300 gr berger OTM out at 3400 fps. In this case, the projectile will remain supersonic out past 3000 yards at my 3500 ft elevation. With a 100 yard zero, I need around 100 moa of adjustment from a 100 yard zero to dial up for zero hold at 3000 yards.

    At 3000 yards, the very top end 338 Allen Magnum loads will retain 1100 fps velocity and over 800 ft/lbs of energy. To dial up for this range, with a 40 moa rail on the rifle, one of these scopes with their 122 moa of vertical adjustment range will get there still just barely. So with no canted rail base, you would need a scope with 200 moa of vertical adjustment range to zero at this 3000 yard range as you would need a full 100 moa of vertical adjustment on the top half of the scope adjustment range. There just are no scopes out there that offer this, well that I know of anyway. So if you take one of these scopes with 122 moa of vertical adjustment, they have 61 moa of adjustment range on the top half of their adjustment range. IF you add a 40 moa rail base to your weapon system, that gives you 101 moa of vertical adjustment range, which JUST gets you to 3000 yards.

    A 50 moa rail would be even better and a 140 moa adjustment range scope would be EVEN better.

    This is where the 150 moa adjustable Ivey rings can really come into their own and allow a lot of scopes to reach out to extreme range. So when you say no one needs a scope with this kind of adjustment range, you really need to do some research and see what we are doing in our sport at the extreme end of performance.

    Again, no insults intended but your just starting to dabble into long range shooting performance with your 243 AI rifle. There is SO MUCH more performance out there that many of us are using to full effect!!!

    There are a lot of us that NEED scopes like this and if someone developed a 40-45 mm scope that had 200 moa of vertical adjustment, there would be guys lining up to get them as we could use them to full effect as well.
     
  12. 42769vette

    42769vette Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    383
    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010

    Very well said sir.

    It doesn't even have to be extreme long range. I shoot my 22lr out to 500 yds. 500 yds is not long range, but the 22 drops rather quickly. I have 105 moa of drop at that range. Even with this scope and a 25 moa base im still not able to dial the full distance.

    We are doing today what was thought impossible as little as 5 years ago. The sport is evolving, and the gear has to keep up.
     
  13. Fiftydriver

    Fiftydriver <strong>Official LRH Sponsor</strong>

    Messages:
    6,848
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    That is very true, lesser performance rounds need more adjustment for lesser ranges, excellent point.
     
  14. Rockfish Dave

    Rockfish Dave Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    332
    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Kirby,

    Thank you for taking the time to post! Very well said, in fact better than I have in the past!

    This has been beaten to death, and until you do it, it is hard to understand.

    My feeble attempt to explain why 40 MOA bases are beneficial for ELR shooting.
    40 MOA base with SS 5-20 - The Optics Talk Forums

    - Dave