muteBG,
You don't have to worry about shooting between heart beats because it is obvious, you have no heart
Sorry, couldn't help it. Not a big deal if people misuse words. It's a mute point.
game: find the misused/misspelled word
It's pointless to discuss not looking like a fool with someone that thinks it is. I don't care if you think I'm heartless. At least I'm not fooling myself. And, the word like this discussion is moot.BG,
You don't have to worry about shooting between heart beats because it is obvious, you have no heart
Sorry, couldn't help it. Not a big deal if people misuse words. It's a mute point.
game: find the misused/misspelled word
I doubt there are many folks that need to worry about shooting between heart beats. Probably doesn't make a top 10 of things that make you more accurate at long range. I just couldn't resist making the heartless commentIt's pointless to discuss not looking like a fool with someone that thinks it is. I don't care if you think I'm heartless. At least I'm not fooling myself. And, the word like this discussion is moot.
I'm glad you get off on insulting people with baseless commentary that radically mischaracterizes them. That's super good for all involved. Back to the topic at hand then?I doubt there are many folks that need to worry about shooting between heart beats. Probably doesn't make a top 10 of things that make you more accurate at long range. I just couldn't resist making the heartless comment
Don't lump me in with him. I'm not acting like that. Nothing wrong with debatingYea, you two will make the rest of us look much smarter
Yep if nothing else what we instruct develops a basic skill to build upon, but it also trains spotters to make split second decisions and shooters to learn how to "make" their rifle fire when needed instead of "letting it surprise you" like most are taught. If you misjudged the wind a couple MPH or the pace of the walker a little you have a potential miss. These things are on demand, require precision and force critical thinking. It isn't easy, especially for the fledgling shooters we get. Many people are rather amazed that one can repeatedly have impacts on such a relatively small moving target at those ranges, especially under varying conditions. Those are the guys that tend to get sent home early.it's as bravo 4 said. With the addition that follow up schools and courses of fire exist and help further refine skills.
The problem with the school house is that they teach just the ambush method in the school as a way of letting the target come to your lead. It's fine, but rarely are people that predictable.
There's another method called the tracking method, but in real life best used in a combo of the both. This is because if you are in support of a assault team, typically snipers are on two of and assault count and charges go off on 1, you don't have time to wait for a target to walk into your shot before the assault starts. Range 62b got some movers and camp atterbury which is used a lot for pre-deployment training has electronic movers. Most humbling teacher is experience in real time, not to say foundation work isn't important too.
Most have the military bond, which tends to be a little tougher around the edges in a debate setting, but make no mistake, I would to go shooting with dfan or most anyone else here.
Gonna add to this if ya don't mind;Get a 22lr and AR-500 steel targets painted white. The instant sight and sound feedback of how the perfect shot feels builds muscle memory faster then anything and 22lr is cheap to shoot.