Laser Rangefinding Riflescope

Discussion in 'Long Range Scopes and Other Optics' started by dwm, Jan 25, 2006.

  1. dwm

    dwm Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    739
    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
  2. green 788

    green 788 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    563
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    It looks like Burris scoured the earth to find the ugliest rifle in existence--this in order to perhaps make that scope look good by comparison, which it still does not.

    /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif

    I dunno... maybe in another decade or two... I used to call Glocks ugly too, but pretty is as pretty does. We'll have to see...

    Dan
     

  3. Chrismadrid

    Chrismadrid Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    315
    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    And BUSHNELL will be doing the exact same thing ;-) - sad really.
     
  4. Pete Lincoln

    Pete Lincoln Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    658
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    looks like a copy of that unsuccesful European attemt 10 years ago, was that zeiss or swarovski that did it. cant remember.
    its too bulky, has to low magnification, and the laser isn't powerful enough.
    that thing will be bought by hunters who think it is the answer to long range problems,it will be disapointing and will go the same was as the previous model.
    Pete
     
  5. ds

    ds Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    235
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    It was Swarovski 3-12x50 with a 600m laser built in. Mega bucks at the time - then many were reduced to 1/2 price,(anyone want a 600m laser today?).

    David.
     
  6. green 788

    green 788 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    563
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    One of these days we'll be really high tech. We'll have a riflescope which isn't the size of a can of oatmeal, but still has LRF abilities--plus... plus /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif The scope will be computerized, and will accept ballistic data from your particular cartridge, and after it lasers a target successfully, it will move the crosshair image (on a sort of heads up display) to the correct point for that distance. Point and shoot, yes.

    Then the next generation of wonder-scope will employ a seperate, wider laser path which illuminates dust particles in the air and gives back a wind reading. It will have a default setting to automatically impute the windage correction as well as the elevation correction.

    Probably will take all the fun out of everything... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif

    Dan
     
  7. rwleonard

    rwleonard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    61
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2004
    [ QUOTE ]
    Probably will take all the fun out of everything... /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gifDan

    [/ QUOTE ]

    That's what archers probably said when black powder came along! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

    Rick
     
  8. tulku

    tulku Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    237
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    G788 you're prescient .....well... nearly . Back in the early 90's I used to attend a lot of Tech. Conferences and College Courses related to Indusrtial Use of Lasers . At one of these I struck up a conversation with one of the attendees about long range shooting . We started talking about Scopes which did exactly what you are talking about . He said they already existed and that they even incorporated at least two more variables beyond those you mentioned . He would not tell me who was making them . When I said I would like to buy one , he laughed rather loudly . Said I had no chance for a variety of reasons ....one of which was the price : about $100K for the prototypes . I never heard any more about them .
     
  9. SBBW

    SBBW New Member

    Messages:
    4
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    G788, part of your "wish" is true, look at the elcan digital hunter, everything minus the RF.
     
  10. grit

    grit Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,375
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    If the challenge is removed, we wont want them. Besides, the government will step in at some point and say, "Civilians don't need this technology". Kind o' worried about that already.