Executive action

wackinandstackin243

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
208
Obama claims that Americans including gun owners overwhelmingly support his gun control. If this is true, why must he resort to executive action? Hmmmmm

His executive action tells me that he has no support. I think it's time for those who voted for him to do the right thing and leave the ammo and components on the shelf, keep your names from cluttering the background check system, and keep your names from cluttering the hunting application process. Just get out of the way for people who voted to protect our right to bear arms.
 
It wasn't just Obamacare that depended on the "stupidity of the American voter" as Gruber said. Obama's entire political career depends on it.
 
So, what did The Great Liar have to say today? I'm at work and unable to listen.

I'm sure whatever it is, he's probably getting bombarded with lawsuits as we speak. :D

I hope such treasonous acts will begin the impeachment proceedings for this clown who THINKS he's above the law and above the Constitution.
 
You guys have it backwards. We should be thanking Obama for driving gun industry stocks to all time highs and helping to sell additional millions more guns (and brass and bullets and powder) than would have been sold had he done nothing. He is the best thing to happen to the gun business in years.

I find it amazing that a President isn't a little smarter as to the unintended consequences of his actions. He really should have kept his mouth shut. I've seen people accuse him of scheming behind the scene. It is pretty clear to me now that he isn't smart enough to scheme! Hillary on the other hand may be a little sharper. Neverheless, she won't be able to do crap about gun control either. The President doesn't make law.

However, if we let the dems get control of Congress we will be screwed. So be sure to keep up your NRA membership and vote for the right folks in your state elections. Do that and no worries.
 
I have only recieved 2nd hand info... So I would like to know more details.

From what I was told by a coworker (who read the Fox News article), all this whole shenanigan turned out to be, was nothing more than saying that all people who sell guns "in the business" need to have a license. Which is completely agreeable. Anyone who sells guns for a living, SHOULD hold an FFL...But I'm pretty sure that was already the law... :cool:

That being said, the parameters of his new law should NOT include private in-state sales between individuals, or transfer of ownership between family members.

However, knowing this dirtbag and his crooked cronies, I'm sure this was not all there was to this... There HAS to be more to this story.

Anybody got anymore details?
 
morning, when I had my ffl. I lost the license because of a mail malfunction. the batfe

said I had to reapply for a license. forget it. now I asked an examiner one day

about the straw deals at gun shows. this was 10 yrs ago. he said we can not stop all

of these deals. we do not have enough field agents. now the bummer says the batfe

will hire XX number new agents. these people have to be trained. maybe. then will

follow the rules of the rules. which no body has seen yet. here in tx. u have SA, Austin, Dallas on on on small gun clubs. do u

catch my drift. what he did was a dusting and cleaning for the gun control people in the corrupt Washington bureau. more hot

air from the hot air ballon specialist. bummer and Clinton r hot air specialist.


NOVEMBER AND COUNTING VOTE VOTE VOTElightbulb
 
I didn't see much for details today either. Stricter gun laws ......whatever that means. All gun dealers should be licensed.....I thought they were. Gun shows to require background checks......but they can't name a shooter that used the loophole. An executive action with few details, forgive me if I am skeptical.

Am I the only one who thought the tears were a bit too dramatic?
 
I didn't see much for details today either. Stricter gun laws ......whatever that means. All gun dealers should be licensed.....I thought they were. Gun shows to require background checks......but they can't name a shooter that used the loophole. An executive action with few details, forgive me if I am skeptical.

Am I the only one who thought the tears were a bit too dramatic?

No you are not the only one. Has anyone seen him cry for our soldiers or our losses at Bengazi ?
He is a good actor though.
 
Must have had the Whitehouse chef peel him some onions and he had them in his suit pocket.....

I look at it this way....

He said his last year was going to be one of executive actions (cause he can't do anything any other way)..... and

All the top candidates have stated that they will flush all this crap right away.....except......

Hillary and Bernie of course.......so

Better vote for Trump or Ted....and vote often.:D
 
I didn't see much for details today either. Stricter gun laws ......whatever that means. All gun dealers should be licensed.....I thought they were. Gun shows to require background checks......but they can't name a shooter that used the loophole. An executive action with few details, forgive me if I am skeptical.

Am I the only one who thought the tears were a bit too dramatic?

His fake tears were so overly dramatic, it makes me sick. He's a good actor... And an even better liar.

IMPEACH the traitor for his treason to this country, and ALL who helped him and supported him.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top