Eric Stecker Responds To Boone And Crockett’s Position On Long Range Shooting

Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6
Ongoing discussions about all types of hunting are necessary. As time passes and technologies advance, it is important to recalibrate ones understanding of the available options while staying mindful of those things we value regarding responsible hunting. Young adults getting their driver's license experience a rapid advancement in the technology related to their mobility. They are compelled to readjust their attitudes and understanding about responsible behavior in the face of this advancement. Does the real potential danger of injury or death by accessing this new technology mean that they should be discouraged from driving? Of course not. What they need instead is to understand the importance of acting responsibly.

To this end, I applaud Boone and Crockett for their latest communications about Long Range Shooting. They have provided three works which eloquently express the importance of being a responsible hunter.
These are:
Long-Range Shooting: Defining A New Ethic in Hunting
Boone and Crockett Club Position Statement
Boone and Crockett Club | Wildlife Conservation | Deer Hunting | Elk Hunting | Big Game Hunting | Wildlife Conservation | Deer Hunting | Elk Hunting | Big Game Hunting

Their comments about the importance of being a responsible hunter are so well communicated that I will not recount their message here but rather encourage you to read them. Within these works, they make several points. Most of these points should be embraced by all hunters. Distance aside, there is no sensible reason why a hunter should take a shot at a game animal in which the hunter couldn't hit the center of the vital area 9 out of 10 times as Wayne C. van Zwoll's article suggests. On this we should all agree.

However, it is appropriate that we agree to disagree on the value of the technological advancements that allow hunters to take such a shot. The idea of fair chase is, at its core, simply an idea. As an idea will, it means different things to different people. I'd offer that the most literal application of fair chase is to go into the wild, barefooted and grab a rock or a stick you come across on the way. Essentially, anything added to this experience is using technology to overcome the game's senses. The hunting experience is just as intimate and real for those who use tree stands, calls, feeders, blinds, decoys, trail cameras, scent concealer, compound bows and the numerous other technology advancements in the area of hunting.

I agree 100% that no shot should be taken that is not certain of success. The question is, how do these advancing technologies factor into this success? Precision rifles that are capable of consistent, lengthened trajectories provide significantly improved shot placement due to reduced drift and drop. Just because a hunter has a rifle that can hit targets consistently at 1,000 yards doesn't mean that this is the distance at which they engage game. Most animals taken with longer range capable firearms are taken at distance far short of their capable range.

Range finders, environmental measuring devices and trajectory calculators allow a hunter to be certain of his shot placement situation regardless of range. These devices are not utilized only when the game is at distance, but at any distance they are engaged. Well made, balanced bullets with sleek designs not only improve shot placement capabilities; but they also increase the amount of energy on impact, further ensuring a quick and humane harvest.

I fully appreciate the effort and the experience one goes through in traversing that extra 50 yards to get closer to an animal. However, for many hunters in the modern era, this activity is not as stimulating as the endeavor of developing a precision rifle and their skills with practice and patience. Such efforts applied by a responsible hunter are certain to produce an ethical outcome while at the same time being a fully enjoyable hunting experience.

For those who want to get closer because that is what excites them about a hunt, I encourage them to do so and I will celebrate with them their accomplishment. If they take a precision rifle into the same situation, they've increased their likelihood for success that much more by utilizing improved shot placement and higher impact energy capabilities that come with this advancement in technology. None of these advancements are preventing those who want to get closer from doing so.

Hunting is about the experience. Being a responsible hunter is about the individual. Those who are responsible will act accordingly regardless of what technological advancements they take into the field. It is not certain that the person commonly recognized as founding the idea of fair chase, Theodore Roosevelt himself wouldn't own and use a precision rifle if he understood how it incorporated improved shot placement and higher impact energy capabilities into his own hunting experience.

In the end, the important idea is that we should all be responsible hunters, and those of us who are in the industry should promote this idea. Berger Bullets started testing our hunting bullets in West Virginia on hogs, and not a shot was taken over 75 yards. The next test was in New Zealand where multiple dozens of animal were harvested. Most of the animals were taken at 175 yards or less, with a few in the 300 yard range. Walt Berger has been a sportsman all his life having run trap lines in Ohio at the age of 9. He's taken one animal at "475 steps". All of the other animals he recalls over his numerous decades of active hunting were taken at distances less than 150 yards.

When we started promoting the use of our bullets for hunting, it was not our intent to become regarded as a "long range" hunting bullet. It just so happens that our bullets are well balanced and designed with sleek profiles. This results in better shot placement and higher energy on impact. Both of these things are useful to any hunter, and provide the hunter with nothing more than options. It is irresponsible for a hunter to assume that using our bullets can give them the ability to shoot to distances they haven't already practiced with confirmed success.

Hunting TargetTo assist in communicating the idea of responsible hunting, we are initiating a hunter education effort. We are making targets available that can be downloaded and printed on an 8.5" X 11" standard sheet of paper. You can download them from our Vital Zone Hunting Targets page. On this target will be an actual size representation of the vital zone area of various different game animals. We strongly encourage those who use our bullets or any bullets for hunting to download this target and place it at any distance at which you feel capable of hitting the center of the vital area 9 out of 10 times.

If you can do this, then you've proven that you are acting responsibly when taking a shot at this distance. Our objective is to further educate that our bullets are not made to achieve long range kills for the sake of distance. They are made precisely to improve shot placement and are designed thoughtfully to allow higher levels of energy on impact. The distance at which a hunter chooses to apply these capabilities will ultimately come down to the character of the individual and their abilities.


Blog Link:
Eric Stecker Responds to Boone and Crockett

Download Free Vital Zone Targets Here:
Vital Zone Hunting Targets | Berger Bullets

Eric Stecker
Executive Vice President
Berger Bullets
 

Attachments

  • Stecker and Ram.jpg
    Stecker and Ram.jpg
    344.9 KB · Views: 17
  • Medium-deer.jpg
    Medium-deer.jpg
    109.9 KB · Views: 13
i am in full agreement. i may not take deer at a mile, but learning this tehnology and technique has made shots at 4-500 yards an absolute.

in good conditions, i made a great 630 yard shot on a doe, and then immediately took another at 452 one it stood up. both shots were placed perfectly.

as humans, we naturally respond negatively to everything we dont fully understand. that is human nature. if you think about this, you will begin to notice your own bias towards new ideas.

as developed and intellectual humans, we have begun to value and embrace new ideas and technology. if you were at work and your boss asked why you chose to not implement an upgrade in technology that your competitor now uses to out compete your product, would you respond "because it was new and i dont want to understand it?" if you did, you would lose your job.

imagine if we taught all of our children how to shoot at long ranges. wounded game incidents would derease exponentially, we would have a defensive edge over all other civilized countries and they could develop a sense of acomplishment and engagement in an activity. how are any of these not what we value as hunters?

i can tell you this, B&C has lost my support until they learn to accept and embrace these values as completely as i do. whether their individual opinions on "ethics" vary from mine, or not.

i myself used to be only a primitive bowhunter because it brought me the level of challenge i was seeking. having mastered those techniques in a short time, i took some 44 deer in half a dozen states with a recurve i made, over a period of 7 years. but then, i traveled, learned and began to enjoy learning new things that i was previously emotionally closed to understanding. i regret B&c's stance, i hope their leadership can see the ignorance in their approach and retain some solidarity within the hunting community.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top