We recovered the deer, so don't give me that song and dance, but any bullet could've killed it better.
I'm relating the bear story wasn't there but it clearly somehow missed vitals because of it's narrow wound channel that it lived a whole year.
A friend that guides up north had a customer shoot a bear in the shoulder and they never recovered the bear. The following year they shot that bear, it had scars on both shoulders. That tsx blasted through both shoulder and never killed the bear.
I guess which bullet failure happens determines our selection
I've seen bears run off on shoulder hits. I always aim middle of the body on bears. They carry their vitals further back then deer & elk. Regardless of bullet, shoulder shooting bears can result in a long track if you don't hit the spine.
That makes complete sense, even a pin hole through vitals should eventually be fatal, but if you miss the important stuff, not goodI've seen bears run off on shoulder hits. I always aim middle of the body on bears. They carry their vitals further back then deer & elk. Regardless of bullet, shoulder shooting bears can result in a long track if you don't hit the spine.
It sucks you lost them.My son shot two black bear this year, one with 225gr Barnes TSX (35 Whelen) and a second with a 200gr TTSX out of a .358 Winchester, and.....we didn't recover either bear; my son is a wreck over it. There was a tremendous blood trail (through and through), and then the trail went cold for whatever reason on both bears. But because we never recovered either bear, we didn't consider it bullet dysfunction, but did consider the circumstances bullet placement; maybe hunter dysfunction. With the first bear that he shot, the bullet drilled through the edge of a 2 inch maple tree before it hit the bear. With the very first bear that I ever shot, it was not one of my proudest moments in marksmanship by any means. The bullet entered in front of the left-rear leg and exited just behind the right-front leg, that means going through approximately 40 inches of tissue; large entry wound and even larger exit hole. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this topic. I still want to try the Hammer bullets in my .270Ai, but I'm still working out a load and really cannot afford to work up a load with the hammers.
For my 28 I have 2 loads 400y and up I use 180 Berger vld with h1000. 400y and under I use 175 Nosler Partitions with h1000. I couldn't get the 195's to shoot as good.@Tom Erickson i would pickup a pound of H1000 and retumbo for your 28.
Run the numbers w/a 145 grain barnes LRX @ 3300 FPS.
Vs.
berger 195 @ 3100 FPS.
both achievable with given powders.
you'll find out to 600 yards wind drift is only about 1 MOA difference w/a 10 mph cross wind. the berger will retain a bit more velocity (not much)
I like the less recoil and flatter trajectory of the Barnes myself. Given the great results I've had with the Barnes LRX they get my vote!
View attachment 164263
Here is a representation of a Barnes LRX impact @ 100 yards.
people say these narrow wounds delay the killing time. I watched with my own two eyes this elk was dead in seconds.
sure it doesn't show the wounding of a lead cup n core bullet like this:
View attachment 164264
However I cannot see a difference in killing. Bore a big hole - or shotgun the lungs with lead, the result is the same, with a well placed shot the animal is down in seconds!
Here is another shot with the Barnes LRX @ 701 yards, just clipped bottom of lung and took out a chunk of the heart. If I listened to everyone on the internet this deer would've been alive for days because I didn't get the extra wounding from a lead core bullet.....the result after impact?? Deer dead in seconds!
View attachment 164266
I just don't see these issues others are having with Barnes. They produce excellent blood trails. An absolute MUST Where I hunt. The Berger's killed just as fast, but we could never reliably get exit wounds! Same with the ELDX.
I Have had great success with lead bullets as well! For someone to boast about how Barnes bullets will not kill effectively, I just don't see that as being relevant to the subject especially when the guys saying barnes don't work well —— don't always have first-hand experience.
here is my experience with em' hopefully the OP gets some intel from my experiences.
When a bullet hits a lung, it should pop like a balloon and liquify.