Back from the range with my 180.5 and 210 HAT's

Discussion in 'Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics' started by Marine sniper, Dec 6, 2008.

  1. Marine sniper

    Marine sniper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    391
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    180.5 and 210 HAT testing

    A visual inspection of the HAT’s revealed they have a rough, pitted exterior jacket compared to the very smooth Berger’s. At the rebated boatail junction they have noticeably worse "fit and finish" than the Berger’s. I can not say that the rough exterior hurts accuracy, but probably does not help.

    I weighed 50 of the 180.5’s (RCBS 1500) and recorded the following.

    150.4-8
    150.5-8
    150.6-10
    150.7-11
    150.8-9
    150.9-4

    Per recommendation of HAT I loaded the rounds .030 of the lands, confirmed length via Stoney Point OAL gauge, average of 5 tries varying from 4.1670-4.1830 (.016) variance. Also per HAT I started at a slightly reduced load. My normal load for my Berger 210 is 80.0 of 7828. For the 180.5’s I loaded 80, 80.5, 81, and 81.5. For the 210 I loaded 78.0

    Conditions at the range were near perfect, 60’s no wind, sunny.

    I shot 3 rounds of my 210 Berger’s and then switched to the HAT’s (100 yards). In short the rifle did not like the HAT’s. See results of targets. One positive thing about the 210’s is that they appeared to stabilize at 100 yards. My chronograph was not working, so no data on velocity.

    I do not mean this to be a conclusionary test of the HAT's, and I understand that they will probably be finicky to get to shoot, exotic bullets usually are. I can say that my rifle will normally shoot anything into no worse than 3/4 MOA. Attached is a 300 yard group that measured .942, shot on the same day with the Berger 210's. This is pretty typical for this rifle if I do my job, since I shoot off a bipod normally, it is tough for me to hold this level of accuracy all the time, but the rifle will do it.

    I welcome comments / suggestions from LV or Greyghost, I would gladly try anything they suggest to get these bullets to shoot accurately in my rifle.

    John
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2008
  2. tillroot1

    tillroot1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    183
    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    John, I am wondering if you have tested again? if so, did you have better results?
    Ron Tilley
     

  3. Marine sniper

    Marine sniper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    391
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    I have not tested again, but will.
     
  4. Michael Eichele

    Michael Eichele Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,829
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Once again someone has failed to hit the coin!!!

    Those coins are unkillable!
     
  5. GREYGHOSTt

    GREYGHOSTt <strong>SPONSOR</strong>

    Messages:
    139
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    Marine sniper
    Sir you have 2 pm's
     
  6. Marine sniper

    Marine sniper Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    391
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Got em, thanks
     
  7. GREYGHOSTt

    GREYGHOSTt <strong>SPONSOR</strong>

    Messages:
    139
    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2003
    this is a 100 yd 3 shot group
    from a wichita 308 pistol
    using the 180 grn hats
    [​IMG]